Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
Report an error
PepsiCo's stock price (PEP) correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Associates degrees awarded in Psychology | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'cold shower' | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'when is new years' | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| Total wind power generated globally | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to learn python' | r=0.97 | 17yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Nico | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
| Gender pay gap in the U.S. | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Elias | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
| Total renewable energy production globally | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| American-type cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| American cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
PepsiCo's stock price (PEP) also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)