Report an error
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Health professions correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Gender pay gap in the U.S. | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'reddit' | r=0.99 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'tummy ache' | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
| Total likes of The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
| The number of chiropractors in Iowa | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
| The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
| Cheddar cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
| Italian-type cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
| Mozzarella cheese consumption | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
| Pfizer's stock price (PFE) | r=0.94 | 10yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Health professions also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)