Report an error
US bank failures correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the 'gangnam style' meme | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'call me maybe' meme | r=0.94 | 12yrs | No |
| Master's degrees awarded in Education | r=0.93 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| Master's degrees awarded in Liberal arts | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'why do i have green poop' | r=0.87 | 20yrs | Yes! |
| The number of interpreters and translators in Puerto Rico | r=0.84 | 20yrs | Yes! |
| Number of Earthquakes in the United States | r=0.83 | 13yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'call of duty' | r=0.83 | 20yrs | No |
| Air pollution in Seneca, South Carolina | r=0.83 | 8yrs | Yes! |
| Unemployment in the US | r=0.82 | 23yrs | No |
| The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in New Jersey | r=0.82 | 13yrs | Yes! |
| The number of marriage therapists in New Jersey | r=0.73 | 20yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'can texas secede from the union' | r=0.68 | 19yrs | No |
| The number of chemists in Alaska | r=0.65 | 20yrs | Yes! |
| Short fiction books published by Stephen King | r=0.64 | 23yrs | No |
US bank failures also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)