Report an error
Master's degrees awarded in Engineering technologies correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of paralegals in Texas | r=0.98 | 9yrs | No |
Hydopower energy generated in Vietnam | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kyrgyzstan | r=0.96 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of respiratory therapists in California | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
US Sales of Artificial Christmas Trees | r=0.94 | 7yrs | No |
The number of pharmacy technicians in Minnesota | r=0.93 | 10yrs | No |
Google searches for 'same day shipping' | r=0.93 | 10yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with American Airlines | r=0.93 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Petroluem consumption in Slovakia | r=0.93 | 10yrs | No |
Drenching rain in Paris | r=0.92 | 8yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Eswatini | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
The number of CEOs in Virgin Islands | r=0.91 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Ticket sales for Cleveland Guardians games | r=0.88 | 8yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'mocking spongebob' meme | r=0.85 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme | r=0.85 | 10yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Engineering technologies also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)