Report an error
The number of private detectives in Ohio correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the first name Courteney | r=0.94 | 6yrs | No |
| How geeky PBS Space Time YouTube video titles are | r=0.87 | 8yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in Business administration | r=0.86 | 11yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in Turkiye | r=0.85 | 8yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.82 | 11yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'restaurant near me' | r=0.79 | 12yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Alma | r=0.77 | 20yrs | No |
| US Rice Consumption | r=0.76 | 14yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Mara | r=0.75 | 20yrs | Yes! |
| Cost to send a letter via the USPS | r=0.73 | 17yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'tetanus' | r=0.7 | 19yrs | Yes! |
The number of private detectives in Ohio also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)