Report an error
UFO sightings in Minnesota correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Minnesota | r=0.93 | 9yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Kenzie | r=0.91 | 46yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Sofia | r=0.91 | 47yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Mason | r=0.91 | 47yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Avery | r=0.91 | 47yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Parker | r=0.89 | 47yrs | No |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.89 | 46yrs | No |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.89 | 46yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in U.S. Pacific Islands | r=0.88 | 42yrs | No |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.88 | 37yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Trinidad and Tobago | r=0.88 | 42yrs | No |
Number of internet users | r=0.87 | 24yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.84 | 47yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.84 | 43yrs | Yes! |
Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America | r=0.75 | 46yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Minnesota also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)